Philosophy Workfare Societys Restraint To Social Reform Of The Many

Theory : Workfare Society's Restraint to Social Reform Of the many talked words in the social change jargon of Canadians today, the term workfare appears to animate a lot of discussion and feeling. Alongside the thoughts of independence, employability upgrade, and work disincentives, it is the idea of workfare that causes the most pressure between it's legislature and business supporters and it's enemy of destitution and social equity pundits. In reality, workfare is a withdrawal of the idea of working for government assistance which fundamentally alludes to the prerequisite that beneficiaries perform unpaid work as a state of getting social help. Ongoing discussions regarding the matter of government assistance are a long way from one of a kind. They are on the whole essentially contemporary endeavors to choose if we live in an equitable society or not. This discussion has been a significant worry since the beginning. So also, the arrangement of money related help to the physically fit working-age poor has consistently been questionable. On one side are the individuals who articulate the sentiments and perspectives on poor people, to be specific, the Permissive Position, who consider them to be casualties of our general public and meriting network support. The issues of the poor range from individual (relinquishment or passing of the family pay worker) to the social (racial bias in the activity showcase) and financial (breakdown in the market interest for their regularly constrained abilities because of a monetary downturn or move in innovation). The Permissive View uncovers that all members in the public arena are meriting the unqualified lawful right to government managed savings with no connection to the person's conduct. It is accepted that any general public which can stand to gracefully the essential needs of life to each person of that society yet doesn't, can be blamed for forcing deep rooted hardship or demise to those destitute people. The purpose be hind the penniless individual being in that circumstance, regardless of whether they are eager to work, or their activities while getting support have basically no weight in their capacity to obtain this government assistance support. This view is by and by not retained in the public arena, for on the off chance that it was, the generalization of the 'Run of the mill Welfare Recipient' would be unfathomable. On the opposite side, the Individualists accept that liberal guide to the poor is a harmed vessel that urges the poor to seek after an existence of destitution restricting their own drawn out interests also of those of society when all is said in done. Here, high qualities are set on close to home decision. Every member in the public eye is a capable person who can settle on his own choices so as to control the movement of his own life. Related to this assessment, on the off chance that you are given the opportunity to settle on these choices, at that point most likely you shoul d acknowledge the results of those choices. An individual should likewise work some portion of his time for other people (by methods for government burdening on earned salary). Those in the public eye who bolster potential government assistance beneficiaries don't give out of good cause, however contrastingly are compelled to do it when told by the Government. Every individual in the public arena contains responsibility for own body and work. Accordingly anything earned by this body and work in our Free Market System is merited completely by that person. Any methods for deducting from these profit to help others is identical to crime. Potential government assistance beneficiaries should just be bolstered by intentional financing. For this side, government assistance at last jeopardizes society by debilitating two of it's ethical establishments: that physically fit grown-ups ought to be occupied with a blend of working, learning and kid raising; and besides, that the two guardians sh ould accept every material commitment of bringing up their children.(5) In mix of the two past perspectives, the Puritan View fundamentally includes the possibility that inside a general public which can adequately bolster every last bit of it's people, all members in the general public ought to have the lawful right to Government provided government assistance benefits. Notwithstanding, the person's drive to work is held unequivocally to one side. Potential government assistance beneficiaries are delegated a duty of the Government. The assets required to help the destitute are taken by methods for tax collection from the profit of the working open. This produces a commitment to work. Thus, if an individual doesn't make the penance of his time and vitality to contribute their income

A Right Against Torture? Essay

Clarify how you would attempt to legitimize an outright right against torment, and how you would attempt to meet the primary issues with such a proposed right. This exposition embarks to manage the significant issues raised by the act of torment in today’s society. All the more definitely, the purpose of this paper is to safeguard a privilege against torment, of which all individuals should profit, and any sort of right, yet one of an outright nature. So as to manage these issues the article will initially legitimize why and supreme right against torment is obligatory from a philosophical perspective just as a methodological one. Also, this exposition plans to introduce its safeguards and scrutinizes against the fundamental issues with this proposed supreme right. In accomplishing the two objectives the paper will introduce experimental and standardizing proof of why individuals from everywhere throughout the world should profit by this total right, and recorded as a hard copy, yet additionally by and by. Before wandering forward with the contentions important to safeguard unquestionably the privilege against torment I will clarify the term of ‘absolute right’ as it is required so everybody comprehends the significance of such a privilege and considerably more, so everybody can recognize the gravity of encroaching upon such a right. A flat out right is a correct that can't be encroached upon under completely any conditions. The privilege against torment qualifies as such a flat out right under understandings, for example, the ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights), the UKHRA (UK Harm Reduction Alliance) and the UDHR (Universal Declaration of Human Rights). There are today 192 signatory conditions of the UDHR; these states are will undoubtedly regard the entirety of the articles of this archive. The principle issue is that despite the fact that these states have marked the announcement, there have been reports somewhere in the range of 1997 and 2001 of torment being drilled in 140 nations. It is thusly tragic when we arrive at the resolution that despite the fact that this privilege is one from which these individuals ought to have been shielded from, that has not occurred and it has not been upheld, yet seriously encroached upon in a considerable lot of the states it ought to be ensured. An outright right ag ainst torment undoubtedly ought not be guarded in any sort of way, however rather it ought to be suggested, it ought to be guaranteed and it ought not be a subject of discussion in any side of the world. The reasons why I will consistently attempt to be a sturdy protector of such a privilege are many. The two fundamental contentions I might want to propose so as to guard this privilege are the way that torment comprises an amazingly shameless and corrupting practice, and that besides, torment rehearsed in today’s society will stop, at any rate in some capacity, the ability of people to advance. The world has advanced from all perspectives, today we experience a daily reality such that has fundamentally improved mechanically, a world that has seen significant upgrades in perspectives, a world that is presently more human rights based than any time in recent memory, but a similar world can't appear to have the option to relinquish one of the most in reverse practices it has ever developed, torment. Business as usual of today’s world isn't savagery as it was in the Middle Ages, despite what might be expected, we experience a daily reality such that has increasingly more at tempted to improve its barrier of human rights and to diminish the however much as could reasonably be expected the superfluous utilization of power, dread and viciousness against mankind and not just. Maybe on the off chance that we had all lived in the Middle Ages, the act of torment would not appear as horrifying as it does to such a large number of individuals today. I unequivocally accept that torment isn't right regardless of what approach I take. Torment is unethical and in a general sense wrong and it has both present moment and long haul unfortunate outcomes on every single person †not simply those individuals it is utilized against. In spite of the fact that torment has been proclaimed an unlawful it has been utilized ordinarily. This implies it occurs in an undisclosed way, individuals don't generally have the foggiest idea when and where it happens the greater part of the occasions, and in the event that they discover it is on the grounds that a few missteps have been made. With the mechanical progressions today it is simpler to catch and present to the open such demonstrations of savagery than it was previously. One of the talks on torment has been on what sort of approach ought to be taken. The arrangements when managing torment are as per the following: make torment lawful and resort to it when required; never resort to torment regardless of what the conditions; announce torment illicit and consistently proclaim that torment won't be utilized yet resort to rehearsing it when required yet just ‘under the radar’. The main sensible methodology most definitely is to never under any conditions resort to torment. Utilizing a procedure of disposal this is as yet the main sensible sentiment with respect to torment as the other two alternatives are unethical. Most importantly, making torment legitimate ought to again require no contentions with respect to why this is shameless. The contentions are bounty but then its barriers are barely any, however first let us address the contentions against making torment a lawful demonstration in any general public. This is a case that need be taken in thought in popularity based states and not absolutist ones since in those cases there is no arrangement of governing rules set up and the state doesn't reply to its residents (who are even seen and treated as minor subjects now and again). In a popularity based society, making torment legitimate appears to be a somewhat incomprehensible errand undoubtedly. I don't have a real measurement with respect to people’s sees on torment but I feel sufficiently sure to state that most of individuals would cast a ballot against it. Regardless of whether that were not the situation, individuals would even now need to recognize what they are deciding in favor of. Let us consider a circumstance where a nation might want to make torment lawful. The gathering that might want to propose such an authorization of torment would introduce its case and attempt to cover up however many real factors concerning torment as could reasonably be expected and ingrain a feeling of consistent dread into the individuals, clarifying that numerous passings would be maintained a strategic distance from on the off chance that they would be permitted to turn to torment methods and to wrap things up clarify the ‘ticking bomb scenario’ (to which I will return later) and attempt to cause it to appear to be a general guideline instead of the special case it truly is. The restriction would for this situation just need to introduce torment as the indecent, debasing and embarrassing practice it is. The most ideal path for this is available demonstrations of torment on TV with the goal that all the individuals that were considering casting a ballot in favor see what torment truly is. I think that its difficult to accept that after such an exhibition anybody would even consider casting a ballot so as to pass the authorization of torment. For the contention let us anyway think about that the individuals, much subsequent to viewing the grim shows of torment would at present decision for the benefit of making torment lawful. In that circumstance, we should simply fall back on Alan Dershowitz's contention and ask ourselves whether we truly need to make such a general public in which somebody has a privilege to torment. We would need to prepare individuals in unique torment methods, have organizations produce torment hardware, torment rooms would no longer should be covered up, possibly construct them in the focal point of the city with glass dividers so everybody can observer what's going on in there thus significantly more impart dread in potential fear based oppressors. Youngsters would no longer say they need to be cops, fire fighters, space explorers or race vehic le drivers, yet torment specialists. Organizing torment would prompt an inexorably rough society, a general public where typicality would move towards savagery. Today numerous individuals accept and stick to the possibility that savagery isn't the appropriate response; individuals, yet whole social orders attempt to maintain this thought of peaceful reactions, yet by legitimizing the act of torment we would help fabricate a general public where in reality brutality would be the appropriate response. Regardless of whether no different issues, laws or practices would endure changes straightforwardly except for torment being lawful that can apparently prompt an increasingly vicious society by continually being in the brains of individuals as a standard event. One of the serious issues today that need be tended to when mulling over the chance of individuals consenting to make torment lawful is the way that individuals are the majority of the occasions concerned basically about their own prosperity and are deceptive. Individuals frequently judge realities or dismissal certain real factors in view of a ‘what they don't know won't hurt themâ €™ mindset. This is the reason they should be given the genuine mortifying demonstration of torment; they should observer it so as to really value its shameless and debasing nature so that at long last they might have the option to make a choice that genuinely mirrors their contemplations and sentiments with respect to this issue. This is one reason why we have to have a flat out right against torment, since without it we would live in a gradually ethically corrupting society that takes into consideration such repulsive acts to occur, a general public that forfeits its ethics to pick up what it misleadingly accepts to be assurance against psychological oppressor dangers. The subsequent option when faced with torment would be for the administration to take into account it to happen ‘under the radar’ while freely sorting out phony promulgation against it for the individuals. This again is indecent. All together for a legislature to take into account torment to happen would imply that it is denying its liberal and equitable qualities since it would accomplish something it doesn't have endorsement from its residents to do. Torment is in all perspectives corrupt and ought to consistently be viewed as indecent. Torment is unethical on the grounds that it dehumanizes everybody engaged with it. It dehuman izes and debases the person in question, a similar casualty who is mortified and treated in a manner not even creatures ought to ever be dealt with. It is shameless in light of the fact that it is an ambush

To Kill A Mockingbird - Scouts Maturity :: To Kill a Mockingbird Essays

As individuals develop throughout everyday life, they develop and change. In the novel , To Kill a Mockingbird ,by Harper Lee, Scout, the fundamental character, develops as the book proceeds. Gradually, Scout figures out how to control her hazardous temper, to forgo fistfights, and to regard Calpurnia, their house cleaner, and to truly gain proficiency with her incentive to the family. Scout essentially changes since she develops, and she likewise changes since Atticus, her dad, asks her to. In the early sections of the book, Scout starts ruckuses at the smallest incitement. One case of this is when Scout thumps Walter Cunningham, one of her cohorts, for â€Å"not having his lunch†, which isn’t a generally excellent explanation by any means. â€Å"Catching Walter Cunningham in the schoolyard gave me some joy, yet when I was putting him to shame with the earth Jem stopped by and instructed me to stop. ‘You’re bigger’n he is,’ he said †¦ ‘He made me start off on an inappropriate foot.’ †¦ ‘Let him go Scout. Why?’ ‘He didn’t have any lunch,’ I stated, and clarified my inclusion in Walter’s dietary affairs† (27). Scout is likewise extremely underhanded and has a naughty attitude towards Calpurnia. She depicts Calpurnia as a domineering nearness, and she does all that she can to get her out of the house. Once Scout does this is when Walter approaches her home to have supper. Scout reprimands Walter for suffocating his nourishment in molasses, and Calpurnia chides Scout. After Walter leaves, Scout requests that Atticus fire Calpurnia, which obviously he doesn’t do. â€Å"Jem said out of nowhere smiled at him. ‘Come on home to supper with us, Walter,’ he said. †¦ Walter stood where he was, gnawing his lip. Jem and I surrendered, and we were almost to the Radley Place when Walter called, ‘Hey, I’m comin’!’ While Walter heaped nourishment on his plate, he and Atticus talked together prefer to men, to the wonderment of Jem and me. Atticus was clarifying homestead issues when Walter hindered to inquire as to whether there was any molasses in the house†¦ Walter poured syrup on his vegetables and meat with a liberal hand. He would presumably have emptied it into his milk glass had I not asked what the sam slope he was doing†¦ It was then that Calpurnia quested my essence in the kitchen†¦ She was angry, and when she was enraged Calpurnia’s language structure became erratic†¦ â€Å"There’s a few people who don’t eat like us,† she murmured fiercely†¦ Jem and Walter came back to class in front of me: remaining behind to instruct Atticus with respect to Calpurnia’s injustices merited a single run past the Radley Place.

Writing a Dissertation Online

Writing a Dissertation OnlineYou can write a dissertation online through a program. Most programs will offer you tutorials and a faculty advisor that you can use to develop your own skills. You can do this in your spare time, you don't have to be in class or put up with other students. This makes it much more practical to do this as an online student because there are no bills to pay or kids at home to take care of.To become a successful writer in your dissertation online you will have to learn the basics of grammar and writing style. This is the most important thing. As with any other writing course, there will be a set of guidelines on how to write your thesis. For example, if you use too many capital letters and you put in a lot of filler words, you can be penalized. As long as you follow the rules, your dissertation will be successful.The first of those guidelines is Arizona College. Arizona College has been offering online courses for years and even a recent graduate can take ad vantage of these programs. If you choose to go to this school, make sure that you have a strong grasp of the English language as well as writing skills.Another option is to go online and take some classes that will help you learn how to work with the Internet. Online learning doesn't just mean learning from textbooks, it means learning how to use the Internet to your advantage. There are many things that you can use the Internet for.These online courses are very flexible in that you can change them around as your schedule allows. This means that you don't have to stick to the same courses all the time.When choosing a program for online learning you have a few options. There are a few good companies that offer degrees in literature and fine arts on the Internet. Theyhave courses ranging from beginner's knowledge to advanced understanding.Some of these programs will allow you to get a diploma in less than a year. Most programs will take anywhere from two to three years to complete. Yo u will have to pass a reading test and a portfolio. Most of these programs will also require that you work a certain number of hours each week.

Coll 148 Critical Thinking Entire Course - Devry - 1308 Words

COLL 148 Critical Thinking Entire Course - DeVry IF You Want To Purchase A+ Work Then Click The Link Below , Instant Download http://acehomework.com/searchquick-submit.sc?keywords=COLL+148 If You Face Any Problem E- Mail Us At JohnMate1122@gmail.com Week 1 Journal Question 1: If you have a disagreement with your supervisor at work. Question 2: If your class paper or project receives a failing grade from your professor. Question 3: If you are having a disagreement with someone for whom you care deeply for. Question 4: If you see that someone is struggling and having a hard time â€Å"making it† Question 5: Now that you have had a chance to apply your guiding statement to several simulations, on a scale of 1 to 10 (1†¦show more content†¦. Question 5. Question : (3 points) Academic Challenges: I found that I . . . Question 6. Question : (3 points) Communication Strengths: I found that I . . . Question 7. Question : (3 points) Communication Challenges: I found that I . . . Question 8. Question : (3 points) Relationship Strengths: I found that I . . . Question 9. Question : (3 points) Relationship Challenges: I found that I . . . Question 10. Question : (3 points) Career Strengths: I found that I . . . Question 11. Question : (3 points) Career Challenges: I found that I . . . Question 12. Question : (10 points) Summary Reflection: Putting all your results and findings together, write a detailed paragraph about what all of this means about you. Include thoughts on how your learning style, your personality, your study habits, and your communication skills relate to achieving your personal, academic, and career goals. Week 4 Research Assessment Question 1. Question : Which of the following is NOT true about words? Question 2. Question : When writing a college paper, the tone and style and overall focus of your paper should be appropriate for Question 3. Question : In selecting a topic for a paper, which of the following is most important? Question 4. Question : In the age of the Internet, the library Question 5. Question : Which one of the following is NOT a good way to create an effective introduction? Question 6. Question : Which of the following is NOT a good way to conclude a collegeShow MoreRelatedColl 148 Critical Thinking Entire Course - Devry1308 Words   |  6 PagesCOLL 148 Critical Thinking Entire Course - DeVry IF You Want To Purchase A+ Work Then Click The Link Below , Instant Download http://acehomework.com/searchquick-submit.sc?keywords=COLL+148 If You Face Any Problem E- Mail Us At JohnMate1122@gmail.com Week 1 Journal Question 1: If you have a disagreement with your supervisor at work. Question 2: If your class paper or project receives a failing grade from your professor. Question 3: If you are having a disagreement with someone

Obligations - 1410 Words

Zachary Zeitzmann Professor Orsini ENC 1102 March 29, 2011 An Obligation Is Not A Choice What defines an obligation? Is it defined as something that one has to do because it is necessary for their living or is it something that one has to do because someone says they have to? I would define an obligation as something that one has to do because it is necessary for their living. What I do not understand is how one person can dodge their obligations. I see people choose to live a life where their obligations are pushed aside as if they were choices. Obligations are not choices, but yet something that needs to be taken care of. In many situations people tend to take care of their obligations because they know that it is a†¦show more content†¦Looking at Phoenix’s actions I can see how she was able to understand the severity of this obligation and the responsibility that was needed to make sure that it was her duty to make sure this obligation was met. I notice how people do not understand that an obligation is not a choice. I see these people choosing to party it up or live an extravagant life, while forgetting to provide a safe, living environment, putting food on their table, or taking care of their loved ones. Providing a safe, living environment allows one to feel safe from harm, putting food on one’s table allows for them to maintain life from death, and taking care of one’s loved ones shows the responsibility needed throughout life. Without these obligations being taken care of, how can one live life fully? Sure, it is fun to go out and party and live an extravagant life, but what comes from that when one pushes their obligations aside? Nothing really comes from pushing obligations aside except instant gratification. A great example of being able to juggle both obligations and partying is shown in Theodore Roethke’s My Papa’s Waltz. The poem explains how a young boy dances the waltz with his father before being sent off to bed. The father comes home with whiskey in his breath so much that could make a small boy dizzy (Roethke 647). Obviously with this statement, it shows that the father must haveShow MoreRelatedAccountability - The importance of obligation with the Army.1598 Words   |  7 Pagesrepresents organization, discipline, and control. Accountability becomes an obligation when you join the Army, it benefits every party involved. The importance of obligation with the Army. Your obligations given to you as a soldier are there to help you perform your duties, much like guidelines to success. Obligations within a workplace are there to benefit those associated within the environment, in this scenario obligation to report our location and actions being taken were there to help our leadersRead MoreObligations, Reasons, And The Will By Ruth Chang Essay1216 Words   |  5 Pages family, and romantic partners, and those made to oneself in terms of projects. These differ from other types of commitments, such as promises, since the obligation to keep a promise exists only because promises invite others to develop expectations (76). The commitments Chang discusses create internal obligations rather than moral obligations because, according to her, they need not cause expectations in others (although they often do) (77). Internal commitments are, fundamentally, â€Å"ones that youRead MoreMoral Obligations And Their D irectional Structure1237 Words   |  5 PagesWhen we think about moral obligations and their directional structure, this involves the obligations that we have to other people. â€Å"Obligations are owed to the benefactor† (Timmons, 2015). This means that a person is obligated to someone who tries to help another person in some way, shape or form. So, let’s say for example I promise you to walk your dog. Since I have promised you this I am not fulfilling my promise because I told you I’d walk your dog, or because I want to keep my promises to youRead MoreThe Utalitarian Approach to Moral Obligation609 Words   |  2 PagesWand(1979) expounds on Hume ethical theory in relation to moral obligation is a theory of good and evil rather than one of duty and obligation- , according to Wand (1956:55):†this statement is quite erroneous’ for Hume does not merely wish to discover the foundation of our moral actions†. Hume account of how motives prompt men to moral actions is quite complex, but Wand (1979) also asserts that Hume distinguishes between two basic type of action to make it more understandable. The first type areRead MoreWealthy Nations Have A Moral Obligation to Educate Poor Nations3696 Words   |  15 Pagesconsumption of the world’s material, economic, and cultural resources. In this paper, I will argue that the primary long-term moral obligation the world’s over-privileged have to the underprivileged is to provide those in need with the means necessary to develop a foundation for fair future interactions. This will lead to the idea that a necessary part of the long-term obligation to the underprivileged, in addition to the redistribution of economic and material resources, is the redistribution of ideasRead MoreJustification Of Moral Obligation On The Suffering Of People Close By Than That Of Those Far Away1423 Words   |  6 Pagescan be morally accepted among applied ethical issues. This essay w ill be split into two main parts, consisting of two intertwining reasons followed by my reasoning for justification of this moral stance. I will argue that - regardless of moral obligation - I believe that we are more justified to care for people closer by, this will be the primary argument of this essay. A reason one might give to only helping someone close, with my assumption that ‘close’ means people within the same society orRead MoreRenewable Transport Fuels Obligation For The Demand Of Petroleum Based Fuels1231 Words   |  5 Pages(Nigama, P, S., Singhb, A., 2011). In order to reduce carbon emissions from vehicles the UK parliament enacted the Renewable Transport Fuels Obligation (RTFO) in 2007 (UK, 2007).This essay will analyse the effectiveness of RTFO focusing in biofuels as well as explaining its success and failure. One of the successes of RTFO is that it is the first official obligation regarding promotion of biofuels in the UK. In 2003, the Energy White Paper was published by the Department of Trade and Industry, in whichRead MoreSAMPLE MEMO FORMAT 2013 10 1596 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿ISSUE: Should LOI recognize an asset retirement obligation for each of the categories of warehouses with asbestos? BRIEF BACKGROUND OF COMPANY Lack of Information (LOI) owns and operates 50 warehouses throughout the country. As part of LOI’s efforts to identify potential asset retirement obligations, LOI’s internal audit group held interviews with all 50 of the warehouse managers and also performed site visits at each of the 50 locations. KEY CONSIDERATIONS INVOLVED IN THE ACCOUNTING QUESTIONSRead MorePeter Singers Argument in Famine, Affluence and Morality1500 Words   |  6 PagesThis paper explores Peter Singer’s argument, in Famine, Affluence, and Morality, that we have morally required obligations to those in need. The explanation of his argument and conclusion, if accepted, would dictate changes to our lifestyle as well as our conceptions of duty and charity, and would be particularly demanding of the affluent. In response to the central case presented by Singer, John Kekes offers his version, which he labels the and points out some objections. Revisions of the principleRead More The Importance of Education Essay782 Words   |  4 Pagescrucial part of society for the past centuries. Some believe that our education is a privilege. Some believe that our education is a right. Some believe that our education is an obligation. The only obligation we might have towards education is to treat it as a privi lege as well as a right, but certainly not an obligation to have an education. Education has been the basis for the success we see in our parents, our teachers, and more importantly, ourselves. Over time, people have considered

Ensuring Leadership Continuity and Building †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Ensuring Leadership Continuity and Building. Answer: Introduction Now a day with the changing era the organizations management process has also been modified and developed according to choice and preference of the customers and prospective clients of the company. To incorporate sound management system within an organization, initially a company needs to strategically plan the management of the company with the use of efficient tools and techniques. Further the internal and external environments of the company are also being considered to view the activities conducted by the business. Along with fulfillment organization objective by using efficient management techniques the company not ignore the code of ethics defined and the legal obligation of the company (Steiner, 2010). The following essay provides an overview of role of strategic planning in a modern business environment. Further the internal and external factor affecting the business and with the legal ethics are also discussed. Strategic planning is considered as a critical aspect of business success. Differentiating from the traditional planning process, the strategies help the company in thinking innovative and act malleably in flexible market environment. The planning process helps the company to create a roadmap which shall lead them in fulfillment of their organization objective. Further in this case strategic planning helps the company in deciding which target market to attract and with means the company can gain competitive edge. With a proper sense of direction and outline, it becomes easy for the company to lead the market. Also this process helps the company in executing day to day business activities of the company (Moser, 2012). Summing up the above statements it shall be concluded that strategic planning assist the company in carefully analyzing the market conditions and work accordingly to fulfill the objective optimizing the resource provide to them. From the initial stage the planning helps the company in setting mission for the management for the organization. Many companies have lost their value in the market even after using effective techniques of management also; the reason is due to incorrect mission statement defined for the company. A qualified mission statement provides between links between idea and practices implemented by the organization. Also a mission statement defines the code of ethics which a company shall follow in order to curb the penalties. After analyzing the mission of the company the role of strategic planning is to set goals to apply procedures in the management. Substantially goals lead to program and program leads to quantitative change in profits of the company. The effects of a strategic planning are identified by evaluating the progress of the company and comparing them with the planned objectives. So it is the role of strategic planning process to initiate missions in the organization and implement them to achieve competence in the marke t (Allison, Kaye, 2011). By conducting the strategic planning process in an organization, the company gains several benefits in qualitative as well as quantitative terms, thus this planning has become important for the organization to survive in the competitive market. The process of strategic planning helps in efficient and optimum use of resource in the organization. Harassing the resources will lead to depletion of natural resource and also this practice is unethical whereas optimizing minimum resources will incur loss for the company. Thus strategic planning helps the company in generation of product and services by using resources optimally. Further planning helps the company in establishing definite goal which is achievable by the company. Setting standard whose completion is next to impossible for a company will lead to demotivation within organization. Apart from that this process also reduces the risk of uncertainty in a company by evaluating the outcomes and market conditions on a prior basis (Roth well, 2010). The process of team building is initiated through the strategic planning resulting in better communication within the organization. Such benefits of strategic planning help the company in creation of competitive advantage in the market. There are many factors present in the market which affect the environment and working of the organization. The factors are further classified into internal and external factors. Internal factors refers to those factors which are related to the internal working of the organization whereas external factors are those factors which are present in the external environment of the business and affect the internal environment of the organization (Crane, Matten, 2016). Furthermore, the internal factors include mission and objectives of the organization, management structure, human resource, communication within organization etc. The mission as discussed earlier is the most important aspect of the organization on the basis of which activities in the business are conducted. The mission statement drives the future of the organization and decides the market in which the company shall and provide services to customers (Oliveira, Martins, 2011). Another aspect of internal factor is management structure and nature of the organization; it includes the composition of board of director in an organization and the organizational structure of organization. The management structure also includes the approach of the company to solve the problem and risk management. The communication of the business also affects the activities of the business, as if there is communication within the organization structure then the company wont be able to achieve efficiency. Also many problems will also not resolves due to difference in thinking of people. The most important internal factors which affect the activities of the business is the personnel of h organization. If the employees of the company are highly qualified and efficient then the organization will achieve its objective whereas if there is dispute in the human resource then the company will not achieve competence. The porters five forces also efficiently define the internal factors affecting the environment which are, bargaining power of buyer, bargaining power of supplier, threat of substitutes, threat of new entrants and industry rivalry. The company uses this model to analyze the internal factors affecting the business operating environment (Lewin, Massini, Peeters, 2011). Further considering the external factors of the organization, the company conducts PESTLE analysis to analyze the external environment. The PESTLE analysis stands for political, environmental, social, technological, legal and economic factors. The political factor includes governmental laws and tariffs imposed in the market; it also includes subsidies grated to the firms. The environmental factors include factors related to the climate which affects the business activities. Weather and ecological change are also included in this factor (Lindner, Wald, 2011). Additionally social factors are the cultural aspects which create fluctuation in the business environment. Population, growth rate, safety are some of the factors lying under this aspect. Technological factors include the technological changes present in the external environment which affects the internal environment of the organization. Quality of technology, speed of internet, innovation techniques etc. are some of the factors occurring under this aspect. The legal factors includes laws related to the organizations such as health laws, safety laws etc. economic factor refers to the factor which includes the economic variable present in the environment. Such factors include demand and supply of product and services (Naranjo-Valencia, Jimnez-Jimnez, Sanz-Valle, 2011). It is an important aspect of strategic planning that companies have to determine set of rules and guidelines to follow in the business management. It is difficult for the company agree on all terms related to humanities, so the company started defining themselves business ethics which they shall comply in order to inculcate rightful activities in the management. Further there are different theories used by the company which assist them in implementing the code of conduct defined by them. The Utilitarianism insists the company to should perform action in the organization concerning the rules or principles made by them. Also it is the belief of this approach that the company shall never disobey or compromise the moral beliefs of the organization, the activities shall always provide a view of the basic rules defined by them (Michaelson, Pratt, Grant, Dunn, 2014). The Kantian deontology theory suggests that the activities of an organization are considered to be ethical if it abide the universal laws worldwide and do not harm the interest of any individual. The theory also believed that every individual shall be treated fairly with respect. The baseline of the theory states that morality shall be followed in all organizations irrespective of the regulations. In no exceptional case a company can waives the moral rule and guidelines (Fairhurst, Grant, 2010). The rights theory of ethics states that, in order to fulfill the rules defined, the company formulates set of standards and tool which shall be followed by all. Also the human rights shall be independent from the influence of various factors. Further there are two types of rights positive and negative rights. Positive rights are those which shall be obligated by the company to inculcate goodness and positivity in their work whereas negative rights refers to those rights which a company shall be obliged to fulfill in order to stop them from doing wrongful activities (Heugens, Scherer, 2010). Conclusion Thus, in the limelight of above mentioned statements it shall be noted that the process of initiation of strategic planning is essential for a company to gain the competitive edge. This process helps the company to define set of rules and standards to follow and achieve the target. References Allison, M., Kaye, J. (2011). Strategic planning for nonprofit organizations: A practical guide and workbook. John Wiley Sons. Crane, A., Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. Fairhurst, G. T., Grant, D. (2010). The social construction of leadership: A sailing guide. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 171-210. Heugens, P. P., Scherer, A. G. (2010). When organization theory met business ethics: Toward further symbioses. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4), 643-672. Lewin, A. Y., Massini, S., Peeters, C. (2011). Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organization Science, 22(1), 81-98. Lindner, F., Wald, A. (2011). Success factors of knowledge management in temporary organizations. International Journal of project management, 29(7), 877-888. Michaelson, C., Pratt, M. G., Grant, A. M., Dunn, C. P. (2014). Meaningful work: Connecting business ethics and organization studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 77-90. Moser, C. (2012). Gender planning and development: Theory, practice and training. Routledge. Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Jimnez-Jimnez, D., Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Management Decision, 49(1), 55-72. Oliveira, T., Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. The electronic journal information systems evaluation, 14(1), 110-121. Rothwell, W. J. (2010). Effective succession planning: Ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. Steiner, G. A. (2010). Strategic planning. Simon and Schuster.

What is Darwins Theory Essay Example For Students

What is Darwins Theory? Essay Many scientists have different understandings and uses of bioengineering. Darwins Theory on natural selection has stirred up some controversies on whether or not to remain studying and researching for information on the theory. Jeremy Rifkin, a philosopher and environmental activist, portrays in his article the world will be coming to an end if we remain to use bioengineering the way that we have been. He feels it is a waste of time and money to keep researching on Darwins Theory. Where as Stephen Jay Gould, biology and geology professor at Harvard University, feels that bioengineering is a complex yet useful item in science. He believes if one can understand the history behind the theory, then it would be a useful item for future use. We will write a custom essay on What is Darwins Theory? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Both authors main view is to create a better environment for humans to live in, but have different thoughts on how to reach the better side. Gould believes Rifkin does not understand science, therefore hemisuses science for political and social purposes- or scientific racism. (Gould, 1985, pg 676)Rifkins outlook on bioengineering is not being totally against it, but as a method that is not useful. He feels that science may be misused andpointless, therefore why have scientists work day and night over projects which are pointless. He doesnt want society to spend so much money on a cause that is what he thinks is worthless. In one case, he says that evolution is a false science.The whole theory of Darwin is fake because it was created due to scientists experimenting over and over again until they came up with some conclusions. He believes scientists should not waste time on tying to find an answer, whenit isnt exact. He believes that no one knows the truthful answers unless one has lived through theera. Gould along with many other scientist disagree to that piece of information Rifkin gives. Gould believes that Rifkin doesnt understand science to the full extent. He has no knowledge or experience behind the field, therefore leading him to the wrong answers about science. Most scientists agree because research and experimentation is the way to learn about the past and future.There was also a statement that Rifkin wrote in Algeny, a book about alchemy of genes, that Gould found hilarious. Rifkin wrote about what he had seen at theGalapagos islands: vultures, condors, vampire bats, jaguars, and snakes. Rifking also wrote, it was a savage, primeval bloodletting and ferocious, unremitted battle for survival. The airwas dank and foul and the thick stench of volcanoes ash veiled the islands with a kind of goulash drape. (Gould, 1985, 682) He gave a very harsh, scary description of the islands. Gould laughs and believes Rifkin has never set foot on the islands. Gould says the total opposite of the environment and physical description of the Galapogas. He says it is a beautiful and there are no harmful animals at the location. Rifkin doesnt totally disagree on science, but is making many false accusations. Hr loves science, but critics believe some of view points against evolution and Darwins theory do not have enough understanding behind them. Gould believes that Rifkin doesnt comprehend or have enough facts and information onthe subject to make a honest opinion. He feels that Rifkin just looks straight and wont look to the side, where he could find deeper information. Many scientists and critics do not appreciate Rifkins rambling on about science and saying things he doesnt know. Rifkin feels he has a say in anything, and these are his opinions on the matter at hand.

Free Essays on Why Does God Allow Suffering

Why is There Suffering? The question many ask in the midst of adversity is, â€Å"If God is loving, why is there suffering?† This question is not an easy one to answer. Christianity does not exempt one from pain, from disappointment, or from the hardships of this life. God disciplines those he loves. Romans 3:23 states, â€Å"We all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.† God is forever by the side of His children and is constantly there to help handle the trial that has been dealt. God says in Matthew 11:28, â€Å"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.† God loves His children more than the human mind can conceive. He places trials and tribulation in their lives to strengthen and deepen their spiritual relationship with the Lord God Almighty. These adversities also contribute to strengthen their personal character. The testing of one’s faith develops perseverance and, in turn, reinforces that one constantly requires a personal relationship with God. â€Å"Every disappointment is a trial of your faith†¦a test that proves the genuineness of your relationship with your God and His word† (Arthur, 1997, p. 29). God continually tests one’s faith to keep them on the right path. James 1:2-4 says, â€Å"Consider it pure joy, my brothers, whenever you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith develops perseverance. Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything.† Experiencing these trials, the individual is greatly strengthened and develops perseverance. The hardship fortifies and shapes one’s character, and in turn, one acquires many amazing attributes through the midst of affliction. Romans 5:3-5 states, Not only so, but we also rejoice in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint us, because... Free Essays on Why Does God Allow Suffering Free Essays on Why Does God Allow Suffering Why is There Suffering? The question many ask in the midst of adversity is, â€Å"If God is loving, why is there suffering?† This question is not an easy one to answer. Christianity does not exempt one from pain, from disappointment, or from the hardships of this life. God disciplines those he loves. Romans 3:23 states, â€Å"We all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.† God is forever by the side of His children and is constantly there to help handle the trial that has been dealt. God says in Matthew 11:28, â€Å"Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.† God loves His children more than the human mind can conceive. He places trials and tribulation in their lives to strengthen and deepen their spiritual relationship with the Lord God Almighty. These adversities also contribute to strengthen their personal character. The testing of one’s faith develops perseverance and, in turn, reinforces that one constantly requires a personal relationship with God. â€Å"Every disappointment is a trial of your faith†¦a test that proves the genuineness of your relationship with your God and His word† (Arthur, 1997, p. 29). God continually tests one’s faith to keep them on the right path. James 1:2-4 says, â€Å"Consider it pure joy, my brothers, whenever you face trials of many kinds, because you know that the testing of your faith develops perseverance. Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything.† Experiencing these trials, the individual is greatly strengthened and develops perseverance. The hardship fortifies and shapes one’s character, and in turn, one acquires many amazing attributes through the midst of affliction. Romans 5:3-5 states, Not only so, but we also rejoice in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint us, because...

Fundamentals of Strategic Communications and Public Relations Assignment - 1

Fundamentals of Strategic Communications and Public Relations - Assignment Example The department also acts as the chief source of contact between the media and the College staff and takes part in the arrangement of interviews with the journalists and issue press releases. The department is also responsible for the production of the college publications and the simultaneous management of the internal communications (Media & Public Relations, 2011). The paper will focus on the optimal strategies adapted from the viewpoint of the public relation consultant in bringing forth several aspects of the College and exposit it as one of the prime educational institutes. Stress will also be focused on the various strategies used in the promotion of policies which would attract more and more students as well as enhance the position of the college in the prevalent competitive scenario. The strategies will be explained in a recent speech of Barrack Obama that will attract at least 400 media representatives and robust media coverage. The realms of Public Relations (PR) generally circumscribes around the creation and establishment of the mutual understandings among the organizations and the public related to those institutes. The planning of public relations is not a haphazard process; rather it is a synthetically complex process which incorporates the basics of attention, impulsiveness, forecasts, analysis and focuses on the consequences. The PR planning also must ensure that not only the organization takes part in the understandings of the public but also in the real understanding of the public. The foremost task of the public relations is to ensure that the public concerned must understand those formulated policies. The Prin its core is an art because it chiefly incorporates the artistic skills, fine arts, language, writing, public speaking and so on.

Ship Of Ghosts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Ship Of Ghosts - Essay Example It was the flagship of the US Asiatic Fleet and in World War II was responsible for holding back and delaying the Japanese from taking over Indonesia. The book narrates the exploits of the Houston until she sinks after a desperate and overwhelming battle with the Japanese forces in 1942, in the Java Sea. The first part of the book describes the naval combat with description of war like booming guns, falling bombs, torpedoes, etc. Hornfischer brings to life the battle as he describes the terror of nighttime naval battles where decks become slaughterhouses and the superhuman effort of the crew as they escape disaster after disaster only to be unlucky in the end when they are hopelessly outnumbered. "Son, we’re going to Hell." These words of the navigator of the USS Houston turn out to be prophetic. The men were forced to abandon the ship and are captured by the Japanese. They were then moved from one camp to another and finally end up in a labor camp in the jungles of Burma. In the second part of the book, the narrative shifts gears and follows the several hundred survivors of the ship to the Japanese POW camps in Southeast A sia. Here it focuses on the labor camps and the sub-human existence of the survivors for over three years, under the barbaric Japanese in the labor camps put up to build the Burma-Thailand Railway. The author describes how the prisoners develop a different kind of heroism when they are without weapons, when starvation stares at them and when they face the brutality of the Japanese guards. At the camps the prisoners suffered from over work, malnutrition, tropical diseases and rotting wounds. Their survival at that point of time depended on their ability to withstand humiliation and hardships without complaining. The author portrays all this beautifully when he writes about the small acts of courage like the stealing of an egg or a can of condensed milk

The sound and the fury by William Faulkner Essay Example for Free

The sound and the fury by William Faulkner Essay The sound and the fury by William Faulkner Introduction            The Sound and the Fury is an intransigently notorious and difficult novel that has received much acclaim and criticism in equal measure globally. Indeed, this is understandable of a book that literally transients the callous southern American tradition of slavery and racial profiling. Besides, the books depiction of a family that descents from acclaim to desolation and finally live in shadows of its past is one that most people would not love to read. Most importantly, the book traces the deterioration of an intelligent southern adolescent who, living by the traditions of the south, carries along racial conventions to his final plunge in water where he commits suicide. This paper trails Quentin along with his racism to Harvard, his new insights into racism and his family’s contribution towards his racist believes.            Indeed, Quentin Compson is the eldest of the Compson offspring. As thus, he feels inordinately obliged to carry on the family’s responsibilities and suffice its traditions of prestige and greatness. Quentin is first encountered in Chapter 2 where is currently pursuing studies at the Harvard, Massachusetts. It is through his prose that the reader develops an attitude towards him and the Compsons. Quentin is crucial because he presents the Compsons traditions and through him, the reader understands the racial profiling in the South. Interestingly, Quentin carried along the southern traditions with him to the university in the north. He, therefore, encountered feelings of abashed shame, hateful or blase. However, the university in the north is potential crucial because, through his encounters with other southern, he learns insightful details about the race.            Spoade represents one of the southerners at the university who taught Quentin on race. He was a senior student at the university and saw pride for â€Å"never [running] for chapel†. Besides, he is proud because he never wore a shirt till noon. Therefore, he did not fall into the traditions of the â€Å"Northern University†. In so doing, Spoade adhered to the mythological grace and slowness characteristic of the Southern life. Interestingly, Spoade had â€Å"five names that also bore the current English ducal house† indicating that he was a detached and self assured person. Spoade boasts in being a gentleman causing jitters of shame into Quentin because the latter lacked sexual experiences. Perhaps, this is meant to infer that Quentin was possibly a gay. Indeed, â€Å"Spoade, [called] Shreve my husband.† Shreve was Quentin’s roommate at Harvard University.            Other than Spoade, racial sense was taught into Quentin at the North by the Blands. This was an ostensibly wealthy family from Kentucky, in the south. Considering that this family shunned joining the confederacy, it distanced them from the â€Å"Lost Cause† idea. An assessment of this family’s lifestyle reveals that they are extremely arrogant and ungracious, perhaps worse than Spoade. Firstly, the she in the family is a dotty seeking her son. Mrs. Bland took an apartment at Harvard on rent to be close to her son. Her motives are questionable as she goes to great lengths to fancy her son. For instance, she sources his clothes from New York.            In addition, Mrs. Bland takes pride in the â€Å"Gerald’s niggers and Gerald’s horses and Gerald’s women†. According to her, Gerald reflected the splendid specimen that was a replica of the Old South Plantation boss. She is extremely snobbish and overly hateful and valueless to â€Å"these ignorant low class Yankees†. She shows some value only to the Southern Whites. It is through Mrs. Bland that Quentin learns of the disdain characters in Gerald, another white. Gerald features as a dashing handsome young brute who also turns out to be a virile womanizer. Gerald uses his physique to lure white women into his lair. It emerges that he is a viciously rudimental schemer who has no respect for women.            Quentin initiated a fist fight with him absentmindedly, and he ended up thrashing Quentin. This portrays Gerald in a bad light as an ungentle and respectful man as is Quentin. This is because he materialistically exploited his women rather than keep them safe and protected. Mrs. Bland inspires Quentin to think on issues of race. Her extreme obtrusiveness and condescending attitude disqualify her as a Southern lady. Quentin also questions the source of the bulk of wealth that the Blands have. Spoade’s mild hatred for the family coupled with their showiness reflects an upstart family in the guise of the Old South. Quentin is emphatic that Spoade’s image of the aristocratic family effectively concealed his mercenary and aggression Yankee antitype. Moreover, Quentin observes the imminent difference between Spoade and his ancestors who were parvenus.            Quentin takes racial insights on the insensitiveness of the Blands and Spoade. Each of them appears shallow, unkind and unsympathetic towards each other. For instance, the white Blands are detached from a fellow white, Quentin, and only the Yankee, Shreve shows sympathy, friendship and concern towards him. Interestingly, Quentin is from the South just like the Blands and only Shreve the Yankee from Canada showed interest. However, it is observable that Quentin secretly envies the Bland and Spoade for their masculinity and nonchalance. Quentin is attached to their opinions and envies their free sense of self. Therefore, he feels awkward and ashamed in their presence.            Quentin’s encounters with the blacks at the Northern University was seldom but impactful. For instance, he encountered the Deacon who was acquainted with the South’s social customs. According to Quentin, the, â€Å"Deacon could easily identify a Southerner at a glance†. Quentin expresses the dexterous skill that the Deacon had by continuing that, â€Å"once he heard one speak, the Deacon could identify your state.† This reveals that the Deacon probably resided in the South. Quentin is emphatic â€Å"de old nigger† sufficed their expectations by casting the slave role accurately and just perfect. Quentin believes that the Deacon managed to fool the inexperienced freshmen, but he had realized of his duplicity although he could not resist condescending him, although curiously. Quentin’s admiration for the black â€Å"old nigger† is evident because he searched him out and donated an old suit although he claimed to dislik e him.            In the street car, Quentin sat next to a black man who wore â€Å"a derby and shinning shoes†. He â€Å"[held] a dead cigar stub† replica to a normal, autonomous citizen. His passive demeanor of Quentin, the white, seated next to him brings Quentin to appreciating the equality between the whites and the black. It is until he is about to alight that he acknowledges Quentin by politely signaling request to pass. The incident retracts Quentin to an earlier episode in which he called a black man on a mule, in Virginia â€Å"uncle’. Quentin gladly offered a gift to him, and he humbly accepted. The two incidences with the black are a learning experience for Quentin on race issues. It irks him that he questions the stereotyping of the blacks whereby he realizes that the Northerner’s expectations influenced him. Therefore, his acquired insights were not natural but rather learned.            Quentin’s family played a major role in his build up to committing suicide. Quentin spent his early years in prestige and wealth. His family owned huge and expansive property, the plantation. He grew up observing the southern doctrines and traditions, and he became indoctrinated into them. He held the doctrines close to his heart, idealizing nebulous and abstract concepts of virtue, honor and feminine purity. The south traditions enunciated strict code of conducts and Quentin grew into these same codes. Therefore, he was stereotypic of the southern perception of the blacks.            As a Compson, Quentin thrived in the lives of commoners who owned lands and maintained plantations as well as several black servants. The commoners were aptly affluent and elite. For instance, Mr. Compson held a law degree and had an office in town. However, the Compson family degrades, deteriorates and their wealth reduces as Quentin grows into adolescence. His father had to sell off part of their plantation in order to raise money for the young Quentin to school at Harvard.            Quentin is absorbed by his sister Caddy. He is affectionate towards her and is willing to cover up for her mistakes. Quentin is thrown into disarray when he realizes the promiscuity that her sister has been exercising. He is disparaged when she turns out to be pregnant. He is infuriated and disappointed by her acts because it tarnished the family’s name. His absorption with sanctifying the family in line with the southern traditions leads him to claiming incest. He tells his father that he and Caddy committed incest, therefore, resulting to the offspring.            On realizing her sister’s promiscuity, Quentin turns to his father, Mr. Compson for guidance. However, this is a tragic because; the man who instilled the virtues of the south disregards the very pedestals that he raised him. Quentin, therefore, feels betrayed and cheated by both his father and his sister for failing to uphold the codes of the south. This torments him coupled with the deteriorated family statue. On his return to campus, he is a thoughtful, troubled and mentally ill person. He starts having disdained thoughts such as committing suicide. He thinks of eloping with his sister to indulge her into his suicide plan. His hatred and obsession with Caddy’s promiscuity made him draw a knife and lung for her throat ,sometimes when they quarreled. Worse stills, he was obsessed with Candy and the thought of Caddy sharing sexual intimacy with another man gnawed him overtly. He had occasionally threatened to kill her. His lover for her is disastrous as he draws a man into a conquest and he is willing to fight for her. Therefore, her forsaking of the south traditions by her promiscuity and out of wedlock pregnancy were unacceptable to Quentin drawing him into despondency and, finally committing suicide. References Faulkner, William. The sound and the fury. Modern Library ed. New York: Modern Library, 1992. Print. Source document

Weaponry during the Elizabethan Period Essay -- History, Long Distance

The weaponry during the Elizabethan period was the most advance weaponry known to the world. The most common weapons used were crossbows, longbows, war hammers, spears, early forms of pistol and cannons. With all this weaponry Europeans also needed armor, like chainmail and plate armor. Different types of weapons and the different kinds of armor were a key component to warfare during the Elizabethan period, in Europe. Long distance weapons were essential to European combat. The main long distance weapons used by Europeans during that time were the longbow and the crossbow. Each form of weaponry had its unique advantages and their pejorative. The long bow (shown in figure 1) was the original form of distance weapons. The term ‘bow’ means to be made from wood, iron or steel. The Welsh, who inhabited England, were the first people to use longbows. Longbows were 6-7 feet long and had a range of 250 yards, and still had the ability to pierce a knight’s armor (Byam 12). A well trained archer could shot 10- 12 arrows in a single minute. Despite these pro’s the longbow had a lot of disadvantages as well. One draw back was only skilled archers, who were costly to train, could use a longbow. Another disadvantage was it didn’t have a ready loaded arrow (Edge 34). The crossbow (shown in figure 2) on the other had been emphatically different. The crossbow had a span of 2-3 f eet and could kill a knight on horseback with one shot, because of good aim (Byam 30). Crossbows had ready loaded projectiles, while the longbow didn’t and the crossbow could be used by anyone since it didn’t require any skill. The crossbow did have a down side though, it had slow reloaded because of a crank and it was expensive. Crossbows were also used for other thi... ...n in her book â€Å"WEAPONS†, â€Å"Gold plating, or gilding, was sometimes used to embellish borders or bands of decorations and, in some cases, entire armors.† By the 15th century, knights were protecting themselves with full suits of plate armor† (Byam 41). His armor usually represented his class or authority. Each knight’s coat of arms had a different personality ranging from different helmets to different metals to different emblems. During the Elizabethan period Europeans mainly focused on warfare. War required long range weapons to slow down the approaching enemy and short range weapons were needed for combat. This era started the usage of combustion and developed cannons and pistols. The advancements of weaponry also lead to the advancements in armor from chainmail to plate armor. Various weapons and armor’s were needed for warfare during the Elizabethan period.

Henry VIII Essay

1. Did Henry VIII have the right to manage his marriages to his own advantage? In my opinion, I do not think so.   While it is understandable he needed a son to succeed him and to continue the Tudor name, he did not have the right manage his marriages for the sake of political expediency.   It is also revealed in studies made on the history of the Tudors is that Henry VIII was notoriously licentious.   His authority as king did not give him the right to change the rules. At the time, England was Catholic and it turned to Rome for moral guidance and when Henry did not get annulment, he changed policy and subordinated the church of England under him and his successors and this was all because he could not have a son.   Furthermore, he executed two of his wives and ironically, one of them, Anne Boleyn, produced his eventual successor, his daughter who would become Elizabeth I, one of England’s greatest monarchs. 2. Should a royal figure be held to a different moral code than his spouse and subjects? Why or why not? No.   Monarchs, regardless of their title, are still human.   Their title and privileges do not make them infallible.   They are also human and therefore prone to error.   They should not hide behind their authority to justify their wrongdoings as what most of them did in history.   They have to answer to someone and unfortunately, they cannot use God.   This is the reason why the philosophers of the Enlightenment eschewed the Divine Right theory when they saw it being abused. If monarchs believed they were ordained by God, how come their people hate them? If monarchs are considered beyond reproach, one needs to wonder why Louis XI was overthrown during the French Revolution or Charles I of England and Tsar Nicholas II of Russia were executed.   These examples demonstrate that the Divine Right is passà © and the reason why some monarchies cease to exist. Those that do exist are prudent enough to relinquish most of their power when they senses the changing times.

Should The United States Congress Adopt The Presumed...

Ozair Manji Dr. Moses Capstone 24 September 2015 Should the United States congress adopt the presumed consent method for organ donations? Introduction to Policy Controversy The current system of the United States as well as most of Europe for organ obtaining is through presumed refusal, which is also known as the â€Å"opt-in† system. In this system a person’s organs cannot and, â€Å"will not be removed from his/her postmortem body unless he/she has explicitly consented to this being done.† (Taylor 383) Under this system, citizens must â€Å"opt-in† to become organ donors by registering to become donors. Consequently, this method of obtaining organs does not produce very many organs up for donation. This is true for a variety of reasons, which is why many are suggesting the United States should adopt a new system of presumed consent. Totally opposed to presumed refusal, â€Å"under presumed consent it is presumed that persons would prefer to donate their organs for transplantation after their death† (Taylor 383). Perspectives on Existing Social Problems Presumed consent is also referred to as the â€Å"opt-out† system because individuals would have the option of opting out of the system and not donating their organs. On a moral level, the debate between presumed refusal and presumed consent seeks to achieve the fundamental goal of organ donation. The goal is to show that their respective systems of organ obtainment are morally and economically superior to the other methods. Issues for socialShow MoreRelatedOrgan System Of Organ Transplantation3687 Words   |  15 Pages Every Person in the United States, Not Just Legal Citizens, Should Automatically Be Considered Organ Donors Unless Otherwise Specified Rough Draft UFID: 9169-9185 June 6, 2015 I. Background According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services, organ transplantation is the process of surgically transferring a donated organ into a patient with end-stage organ failure (U.S Dept of health and human services website). End-stage organ failure can be attributed toRead MoreOrgan System Of Organ Transplantation3687 Words   |  15 Pages Every Person in the United States, Not Just Legal Citizens, Should Automatically Be Considered Organ Donors Unless Otherwise Specified Rough Draft UFID: 9169-9185 June 6, 2015 I. Background According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services, organ transplantation is the process of surgically transferring a donated organ into a patient with end-stage organ failure (U.S Dept of health and human services website). End-stage organ failure can be attributed toRead MoreCodes and Notes on Public International Law10497 Words   |  42 Pagesand which govern the relations of states and other entities invested with international legal personality. Formerly known as â€Å"law of nations† coined by Jeremy Bentham in 1789. Three Major Parts of Public International Law 1. Laws of Peace – normal relations between states in the absence of war. 2. Laws of War – relations between hostile or belligerent states during wartime. 3. Laws of Neutrality – relations between a non-participant state and a participant state during wartime. This also refersRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pageswithin text. Copyright  © 2011, 2007, 2005, 2002, 1998 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice Hall, One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458. All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. This publication is protected by Copyright, and permission should be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise